Over the years, I have referred to my impressions of the difference in voting numbers between Minnesota and North Carolina as a critical factor in democratic stability. My focus was on the principal that the greater the proportion of people who participated in elections, the more stable and established is the democracy. This may be obvious, but it may be that stability is more depends on the composition of the electorate itself. Or is it the way that different people are integrated by a common ethic, no mater how diverse their backgrounds. In today’s world, where there is a different and more diverse distributions among the types of people who vote, can we draw the same conclusion.
I come from Minneapolis and believe that it is the most democratic place I have ever liven. I am sure there are other places that are as fully participatory and democratic as Minneapolis, such as X in Washington State, for example. But my personal experiences with democracy in the States have had lower participation scores. These include Ohio, New Jersey, North Carolina, District of Columbia and Virginia. Are they less democratic as a result? I would argue that this is true. I was elected to the State Senate for three two-year terms in North Carolina. But I was also active in local politics when I lived in Ohio, New Jersey and Virginia. I have also lived in other countries that claim to be democratic – India, for one, plus several European countries – Austria, France and X. My family is American, but we have roots in X and X and have visited both. My father was born in Canada, and that makes it possible for me to choose adding Canadian citizenship.
Minnesota’s voling rate is usually the highest or second highest in all federal elections. And Minneapolis has the highest turnout of voters in local elections among cities in the US. In the latest local elections in 2025, there was a turnout rate of over 70%. So it is ironic that the federal ISE focus is on Minneapolis.
Actually, it may be one of the reasons why it is chosen. Higner turnout has been associated with Democrats and lower turnout with Republicans. Presumably this applies to both voter registration and voter turnout. The higher voter registration is not the same as higher registration of eligible voters, although the two may be related. And of course, different registration rules also influence the tumbers state by state. And it may be that current distribution of voters by party is changing at least for those in the middle if not the rich and poor. But that doesnt explain the Minneapolis numbers.
Turning to North Carolina, which is where I have the most experience wth goting patterns, there is at least one difference that needs to be mentioned. And that is the rachial mix of the voters, marticularly the presence of a much larger black population in North Carolina. During the time that I lived in Minnesota, the voting popuation was almost all white. That has changed, starting in the 1970s but especialy in the 1990s.
Here is the racial distribution for the two states as well as the comparble subunites of Minneapolis and XX.
